Just read an article that Kmart and Sears are going to close 75 stores before Christmas and 5,300 jobs are going to be lost. I see Obama's economic recovery isn't doing so good. I've recently read a few other articles where places were closing and more jobs are lost too.
I can hardly wait for 2016 to get here to get this joker out of office. Obama and his administration have been very detrimental to this country and the Constitution. I'm sick and tired of all of the political correctness and their socialist agenda.
When I see most liberals spewing their vitriol on social media I truly believe they have some serious mental issues. It goes along with all the insane shit going on in Ferguson and St. Louis. Now information is being leaked that seem to confirm the Officers story.
Which brings something to mind about the media and authority figures like the one Senator spewing a bunch of bullshit even before the facts came out. Just a bunch of speculation and in some instance flat out lies being told or fabricated.
Video of Mike Brown coming out showing him rough up the store clerk at the store he allegedly robbed. It's pretty clear to me if people would quit breaking the law they'd quit getting shot by the Police.
I'm sure there are incidence where police are over zealous and fabricate reasons to pull people over or harass them. I have problems like that myself dealing with law enforcement where they have abused their power and/or were just being all out pricks just because they carry a badge and have some authority. Over all though my experiences with law enforcement have been alright.
I can understand where they are coming from too. They put up with a lot of assholes throughout their days working. Much of the time it's dealing with a bunch of douchebags they shouldn't really be dealing with because these people are drunk or high fighting with their spouses. Or, they are just plain ignorant and don't respect the law or law enforcement.
As soon as these people put on their uniforms and badges they become moving targets. Often gangs and riff faff try to kill cops for initiations or just because they are a cop. I know I couldn't be a cop. I don't have the patience or discipline to put up with what most law enforcement officers have to deal with on a day to day basis.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Obama
This administration has to be the worst one I have ever seen. The recent Ebola scare seems to be the latest crisis Obama has failed to handle. I've said all along he was never qualified to be president. The past six years have been a circle jerk to be polite.
Appointing this Klain character as the ebola czar only shows Obama's inability to lead from the front again. This administration also seems to keep blaming the republicans for blocking whatever. Even though the Senate is democratically controlled and has been able to even pass a budget. We don't have a Surgeon General because Obama seems to be only able to try to appoint political hacks.
Why isn't HHS or NIH isn't in charge of the Ebola problem? Appointing another czar to something that is a problem is only going to add more bureaucracy and red tape. Appointing Klain only looks like a PR move to make it look like Obama is doing something.
Heads need to roll over this Benghazi fiasco as well. This crisis began well before it should have been a problem. Obama was preaching how safe it was and how calm the region was after Ghadaffi was taken out. Pulling out the security team that was already there and refusing to increase security months prior to. Mainly I believe because we were in the middle of another election cycle and they wanted to make it look like peaches and cream over there.
After Ghadaffi was taken out the region became more unstable because of the different tribes trying to gain control from the void left in Ghadaffi's absence. Car bombings and the attacks were on the rise. And from what I can tell from the media reports Ambassador Stevens was targeted in the hotel he was set up in and had been moved to the compound some what in the middle of them preparing the location while they were still upgrading added security measures.
I hope Gowdy and the Benghazi committee can get to the bottom of all this crap surrounding Benghazi. I know something is up because of the way people are acting, being reluctant to testify, or people being unavailable. There is definitely something being covered up.
It looks like to me this administration were trying to cover their ass and more worried about the elections instead of being concerned about the safety of our personnel in Benghazi. Instead of being transparent and telling the truth that the region was more unstable and time was needed until thing could calm down and a stable government could have been in place.
I know I would have much rather heard the President come out and say security had to be upgraded to protect these people. Or, closing the embassy for awhile and getting them out there. Instead of flat out lying making it sound like Libya was a vacation resort after Ghadaffi was killed.
And on the Ebola shit. There do need to be a travel ban, at least restriction for traveling from the nations where there is an epidemic. Can we trust proper screening to take place? Ar people going to lie? Can we relying on other countries to be diligent and screen travelers properly? I doubt it.
I saw an interview with one of the guys from Samaritans Purse state he traveled through Belgium and wasn't screened after coming from west Africa. He wasn't initially for a travel ban but, he is more on board with one now because of his experiences.
The World Health Organization, the CDC, NIH, and our government has dropped the ball big time on this. They have all had plenty of time to be proactive on this because warnings of this type of thing getting started has been talked about for years. I have heard from many sources, including the ones I've mentioned that it wasn't if, but when an epidemic and pandemic would happen. It makes sense it could be easy for a pandemic could happen. Because the world is getting smaller. One can travel around the world in hours instead of weeks or months.
All it would take is to have one person on a plane contaminating it and/or infecting others on the plane. Potentially infecting a couple of hundred people. Each one of them infecting whomever they com in contact with. Out of those a hundred on so people each one could potentially infected a few dozen people. Friends, relatives, co-workers, or people they come in contact with stopping to get a bite to eat. Is Ebola going to be the pandemic that will make history? It's a scary thought.
One big thing I have a problem with is our government is reactionary on way too many levels when they should be proactive and prevent shit or, at least make an effort. Too much partisan politics bullshit going on. We can never seem to learn from lessons learned. I'm also sick and tired of hearing the same old ideas coming out of our politicians. Most of what they want try or keep preaching about has been done, or have tried. It doesn't fucking work. Their excuse seems to be be it will work because it wasn't done right before. Isn't the definition of insanity trying the same thing over and over again expecting different results only to get the same results?
And the people that complain the government isn't working, or it's broke. It's not, even though we haven't had much happen that should have. Like the budget not being passed, the sequester, and other shit that is stalled. The government is working as it was designed to do. Keeping one party or individual running completely a muck and having true tyranny or whatever. There is still enough balance of power that things are clogged up and/or stagnant. Which can be a good thing. We could end up with more regulations or legislation that really would destroy our civil liberties and rights. So, in some ways I prefer having things in a gridlock so us pee ons aren't trampled on more than we already are.
Appointing this Klain character as the ebola czar only shows Obama's inability to lead from the front again. This administration also seems to keep blaming the republicans for blocking whatever. Even though the Senate is democratically controlled and has been able to even pass a budget. We don't have a Surgeon General because Obama seems to be only able to try to appoint political hacks.
Why isn't HHS or NIH isn't in charge of the Ebola problem? Appointing another czar to something that is a problem is only going to add more bureaucracy and red tape. Appointing Klain only looks like a PR move to make it look like Obama is doing something.
Heads need to roll over this Benghazi fiasco as well. This crisis began well before it should have been a problem. Obama was preaching how safe it was and how calm the region was after Ghadaffi was taken out. Pulling out the security team that was already there and refusing to increase security months prior to. Mainly I believe because we were in the middle of another election cycle and they wanted to make it look like peaches and cream over there.
After Ghadaffi was taken out the region became more unstable because of the different tribes trying to gain control from the void left in Ghadaffi's absence. Car bombings and the attacks were on the rise. And from what I can tell from the media reports Ambassador Stevens was targeted in the hotel he was set up in and had been moved to the compound some what in the middle of them preparing the location while they were still upgrading added security measures.
I hope Gowdy and the Benghazi committee can get to the bottom of all this crap surrounding Benghazi. I know something is up because of the way people are acting, being reluctant to testify, or people being unavailable. There is definitely something being covered up.
It looks like to me this administration were trying to cover their ass and more worried about the elections instead of being concerned about the safety of our personnel in Benghazi. Instead of being transparent and telling the truth that the region was more unstable and time was needed until thing could calm down and a stable government could have been in place.
I know I would have much rather heard the President come out and say security had to be upgraded to protect these people. Or, closing the embassy for awhile and getting them out there. Instead of flat out lying making it sound like Libya was a vacation resort after Ghadaffi was killed.
And on the Ebola shit. There do need to be a travel ban, at least restriction for traveling from the nations where there is an epidemic. Can we trust proper screening to take place? Ar people going to lie? Can we relying on other countries to be diligent and screen travelers properly? I doubt it.
I saw an interview with one of the guys from Samaritans Purse state he traveled through Belgium and wasn't screened after coming from west Africa. He wasn't initially for a travel ban but, he is more on board with one now because of his experiences.
The World Health Organization, the CDC, NIH, and our government has dropped the ball big time on this. They have all had plenty of time to be proactive on this because warnings of this type of thing getting started has been talked about for years. I have heard from many sources, including the ones I've mentioned that it wasn't if, but when an epidemic and pandemic would happen. It makes sense it could be easy for a pandemic could happen. Because the world is getting smaller. One can travel around the world in hours instead of weeks or months.
All it would take is to have one person on a plane contaminating it and/or infecting others on the plane. Potentially infecting a couple of hundred people. Each one of them infecting whomever they com in contact with. Out of those a hundred on so people each one could potentially infected a few dozen people. Friends, relatives, co-workers, or people they come in contact with stopping to get a bite to eat. Is Ebola going to be the pandemic that will make history? It's a scary thought.
One big thing I have a problem with is our government is reactionary on way too many levels when they should be proactive and prevent shit or, at least make an effort. Too much partisan politics bullshit going on. We can never seem to learn from lessons learned. I'm also sick and tired of hearing the same old ideas coming out of our politicians. Most of what they want try or keep preaching about has been done, or have tried. It doesn't fucking work. Their excuse seems to be be it will work because it wasn't done right before. Isn't the definition of insanity trying the same thing over and over again expecting different results only to get the same results?
And the people that complain the government isn't working, or it's broke. It's not, even though we haven't had much happen that should have. Like the budget not being passed, the sequester, and other shit that is stalled. The government is working as it was designed to do. Keeping one party or individual running completely a muck and having true tyranny or whatever. There is still enough balance of power that things are clogged up and/or stagnant. Which can be a good thing. We could end up with more regulations or legislation that really would destroy our civil liberties and rights. So, in some ways I prefer having things in a gridlock so us pee ons aren't trampled on more than we already are.
Saturday, April 19, 2014
Benghazi
The more I dig around and the more information I come across about Benghazi the more I am inclined to believe something is getting covered up and/or people are trying to cover their asses. Most of this stuff goes back to when Ghadhafi was taken out.
When Obama made his big speech about Ghadhafi being killed he was adamant about Libya being a much safer place and made it sound like a vacation resort. On the contrary, from what main stream media and alternative sources were reporting about the region becoming more unstable due in part from Ghadhafi taking a dirt nap.
There we plenty of reports where terrorist type attacks were on the uprise. Many of our. Allies pulled their diplomats out of Libya as well because of how unstable the region had become. For whatever reasons Ambassador Stevens decided to stay to help get things in order. I have found out the he was supposed to have been fluent in Arabic and felt it important to work with the Libyan government until they became stable. I can see there could have been many advantages getting a fresh start with a new government and showing them we would support and help them instead of turning tail.
I pulled a lot of the testimonies up on YouTube and watched them on CSPAN when I could about Benghazi. There is a lot of cya going from my impression of the situation. Hillary Clinton mostly skirted the questions trying to put the focus on policies and other stuff they were working on. She wouldn't explain anything about why the security people were really pulled out of there. She tried to blame it on budget constraints, communication problems, or she didn't know anything about requests for more security.
It seemed too much of a coincidence the dirt cake out about Petraeus when it did too. Who really give a shit whether or not he was banging the woman who wrote his autobiography, or whatever book she was, or did write about him. I think that came out just to shut him up, because I believe he could have blown the lid clean off the entire Benghazi debacle.
I also believe the YouTube video that was supposed to spark off this so called protest was pure unadulterated bullshit. The attack occurring on September 11. The way this administration scrambled with conflicting stories. They knew what was coming and trying to cover their own ass because they didn't want to admit their policy wasn't what they claimed it was. I know I would have rather heard the truth on the front end. Saying since Ghadhafi's death things have heated up and we may need to boost security for our ambassador in Libya temporarily.
They even tried passing the problem off on the host country saying it's their responsibility for providing security. From what I've found out, the host country works in conjunction with the other countries providing security. I don't think it would have caused a problem if we would have beefed up security. There are still many unanswered questions that we may never find the true answers to. Because there could be legal ramifications for some very powerful people, like Hillary Clinton, Obama, and others that have been involved. There has been a reluctance to have any further investigations which tells me other could well be implicated with wrong doing.
From the information I've read in the report on Benghazi there really wasn't any reason security couldn't have been provided and expanded if the state department and the administration would have acted timely about the the communications had been handled properly. Instead the security was pulled instead of left there and reinforced. Why couldn't they fall on the side of caution and beef up security?
I think it was mainly done to cover Obama's ass because he was wanting to look like a hero and such a great peace maker. By telling the American people how peaceful and wonderful it was over there. Stating the policies were working almost without a hitch and making great strides in whatever. Some of it could have been said and done because we are so tired of being at war. Having troops deployed and fighting in different Arab countries. The administration may have been worried about us not having the stomach to possibly being in another country by deploying more security forces.
Whatever the reasons were it back fired withe some very terrible consequences losing four Americans the way we did. This entire situation stinks from the top down like a dead fish. We need to put pressure on the people who represent us to get to the truth about Benghazi. At least to find closure for the families involved. And to make sure operating procedures are more fluent to protect our personnel in hot zones. Many of our standards and policies have cost us because we have morals and ethics our enemies know as well. They also know we won't compromise those morals and ethics and use them to their advantage. In some ways they are our weaknesses.
With the terrorist attacks becoming more of the norm instead of conventional warfare. We may need to use more guerrilla type tactics and methods. With the globalization of everything. I don't really see having a conventional war with anyone like we have in previous wars. With everything intertwined the way it is. A conventional war or just about any war would financially devastate many countries instead of one or two. Which one one of the main reasons globalization started in the 1950's to help curb anyone like Hitler like to come to power again.
When Obama made his big speech about Ghadhafi being killed he was adamant about Libya being a much safer place and made it sound like a vacation resort. On the contrary, from what main stream media and alternative sources were reporting about the region becoming more unstable due in part from Ghadhafi taking a dirt nap.
There we plenty of reports where terrorist type attacks were on the uprise. Many of our. Allies pulled their diplomats out of Libya as well because of how unstable the region had become. For whatever reasons Ambassador Stevens decided to stay to help get things in order. I have found out the he was supposed to have been fluent in Arabic and felt it important to work with the Libyan government until they became stable. I can see there could have been many advantages getting a fresh start with a new government and showing them we would support and help them instead of turning tail.
I pulled a lot of the testimonies up on YouTube and watched them on CSPAN when I could about Benghazi. There is a lot of cya going from my impression of the situation. Hillary Clinton mostly skirted the questions trying to put the focus on policies and other stuff they were working on. She wouldn't explain anything about why the security people were really pulled out of there. She tried to blame it on budget constraints, communication problems, or she didn't know anything about requests for more security.
It seemed too much of a coincidence the dirt cake out about Petraeus when it did too. Who really give a shit whether or not he was banging the woman who wrote his autobiography, or whatever book she was, or did write about him. I think that came out just to shut him up, because I believe he could have blown the lid clean off the entire Benghazi debacle.
I also believe the YouTube video that was supposed to spark off this so called protest was pure unadulterated bullshit. The attack occurring on September 11. The way this administration scrambled with conflicting stories. They knew what was coming and trying to cover their own ass because they didn't want to admit their policy wasn't what they claimed it was. I know I would have rather heard the truth on the front end. Saying since Ghadhafi's death things have heated up and we may need to boost security for our ambassador in Libya temporarily.
They even tried passing the problem off on the host country saying it's their responsibility for providing security. From what I've found out, the host country works in conjunction with the other countries providing security. I don't think it would have caused a problem if we would have beefed up security. There are still many unanswered questions that we may never find the true answers to. Because there could be legal ramifications for some very powerful people, like Hillary Clinton, Obama, and others that have been involved. There has been a reluctance to have any further investigations which tells me other could well be implicated with wrong doing.
From the information I've read in the report on Benghazi there really wasn't any reason security couldn't have been provided and expanded if the state department and the administration would have acted timely about the the communications had been handled properly. Instead the security was pulled instead of left there and reinforced. Why couldn't they fall on the side of caution and beef up security?
I think it was mainly done to cover Obama's ass because he was wanting to look like a hero and such a great peace maker. By telling the American people how peaceful and wonderful it was over there. Stating the policies were working almost without a hitch and making great strides in whatever. Some of it could have been said and done because we are so tired of being at war. Having troops deployed and fighting in different Arab countries. The administration may have been worried about us not having the stomach to possibly being in another country by deploying more security forces.
Whatever the reasons were it back fired withe some very terrible consequences losing four Americans the way we did. This entire situation stinks from the top down like a dead fish. We need to put pressure on the people who represent us to get to the truth about Benghazi. At least to find closure for the families involved. And to make sure operating procedures are more fluent to protect our personnel in hot zones. Many of our standards and policies have cost us because we have morals and ethics our enemies know as well. They also know we won't compromise those morals and ethics and use them to their advantage. In some ways they are our weaknesses.
With the terrorist attacks becoming more of the norm instead of conventional warfare. We may need to use more guerrilla type tactics and methods. With the globalization of everything. I don't really see having a conventional war with anyone like we have in previous wars. With everything intertwined the way it is. A conventional war or just about any war would financially devastate many countries instead of one or two. Which one one of the main reasons globalization started in the 1950's to help curb anyone like Hitler like to come to power again.
Friday, March 28, 2014
Wedding Insurance?
Really? What the fuck is wrong with this picture that we are encouraged to get wedding insurance? I can understand that to a certain point depending on how long it takes to plan your wedding paying deposits on wedding items or services that may not be around in a year or two. Somebody might die or go out of business before your wedding and you might have to find a new florist or venue to be married at.
What caught my ear for one of the reasons to get wedding insurance is in case somebody who comes to your wedding and reception decides to drink and drive.
What the fuck!
It's the same old fucking bullshit that people aren't responsible or accountable for their own actions. Why does it have to be the responsibility of the bride and groom, or the venues babysitting guests who decide to get inebriated, that may drive, and God forbid go out and kill someone?
Its the same for bars or other establishments who sell alcohol as well. Granted it should be our responsibility at some point where one of our friends has become completely retarded from drinking too much to cut them off. Encourage them to get help if they do have a problem with substance abuse. Eventually, what it comes down to, is their choice to drink or not to drink if they have a problem holding their liquor.
Even though it is considered a disease they should seek the professional help and make the conscience decision to stop by whatever means possible before they become a threat to society and put people in harms way because of their selfish decisions. It still comes down to the choices these people make.
We can't really control people, we can only control what we do and how we react to things. So, if people decide to get intoxicated to the point they shouldn't be operating a motor vehicle and kill someone. It should be their sole responsibility to face the consequences of their actions. The bride and groom didn't force them to drink, neither did the venue the bride and groom rented. That should fall solely on the individual that made the poor decision to drink and drive. Is it going to be the responsibility of car manufacturers next? Is it their fault the didn't put breathalysers in the cars when they built them? Using them as a fail safe to blow into breathalysers and debilitate the vehicle from starting if alcohol is detected?
I don't buy the diminished faculties argument either when people drink and drive and go out and kill people. They didn't have diminished faculties when they took the first drink. If this kind of behavior is repetitive the consequences should be harsher. Which, goes back to their choices and ignoring or denying the issues and problems they have.
We've all heard the stories of people having DUI's in the double digits and they are still out drinking and driving. Not having a license and driving under suspension. If they can't handle living in society and can't stop drinking for whatever reason. They need to be locked up somewhere out of harms way until they can be rehabilitated.
It's ridiculous.
What caught my ear for one of the reasons to get wedding insurance is in case somebody who comes to your wedding and reception decides to drink and drive.
What the fuck!
It's the same old fucking bullshit that people aren't responsible or accountable for their own actions. Why does it have to be the responsibility of the bride and groom, or the venues babysitting guests who decide to get inebriated, that may drive, and God forbid go out and kill someone?
Its the same for bars or other establishments who sell alcohol as well. Granted it should be our responsibility at some point where one of our friends has become completely retarded from drinking too much to cut them off. Encourage them to get help if they do have a problem with substance abuse. Eventually, what it comes down to, is their choice to drink or not to drink if they have a problem holding their liquor.
Even though it is considered a disease they should seek the professional help and make the conscience decision to stop by whatever means possible before they become a threat to society and put people in harms way because of their selfish decisions. It still comes down to the choices these people make.
We can't really control people, we can only control what we do and how we react to things. So, if people decide to get intoxicated to the point they shouldn't be operating a motor vehicle and kill someone. It should be their sole responsibility to face the consequences of their actions. The bride and groom didn't force them to drink, neither did the venue the bride and groom rented. That should fall solely on the individual that made the poor decision to drink and drive. Is it going to be the responsibility of car manufacturers next? Is it their fault the didn't put breathalysers in the cars when they built them? Using them as a fail safe to blow into breathalysers and debilitate the vehicle from starting if alcohol is detected?
I don't buy the diminished faculties argument either when people drink and drive and go out and kill people. They didn't have diminished faculties when they took the first drink. If this kind of behavior is repetitive the consequences should be harsher. Which, goes back to their choices and ignoring or denying the issues and problems they have.
We've all heard the stories of people having DUI's in the double digits and they are still out drinking and driving. Not having a license and driving under suspension. If they can't handle living in society and can't stop drinking for whatever reason. They need to be locked up somewhere out of harms way until they can be rehabilitated.
It's ridiculous.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Banning Bossy
I just don't get the mentality of banning words because of the uncomfortable connotations that become attached to words like bossy.
If being called bossy is derogatory you should own it if your personality or goals in life are to hold a leadership position. If your self esteem is that low, or that sensitive you better suck it up buttercup, because the world is a tough place to be in.
Somewhere along the line somebody failed you by not teaching you the necessary survival skills to cope with being called bossy. If it offends you, you're probably not in a position to be called bossy. Because you probably don't have the grit to be a leader any how.
That's a drop in the bucket compared to a lot of the rhetoric, vitriol, and hatred one will have to put up with during a lifetime. And the people that spew this shit tend to have miserable lives and are miserable and seem to feed on making everyone else miserable.
Would you rather have young girls called cunts, bitches, whores, sluts, cum dumpsters, or a lengthy list of other derogatory remarks. If you can't handle being called bossy, how the fuck are you going to handle being called anything else? Or, put up with a lot of other bullshit life throws in your direction? If anything ban these words. Even thought I don't believe in banning any words. If words or subjects make people uncomfortable they need to be discussed and dealt with accordingly. It interferes with free speech whether or not it's racist, sexist, homophobic, or considered taboo depending on your beliefs. Wouldn't it be better to discuss these issues and educate people how truly ignorant this stuff is? I don't really give a shit what people say. Unless it insights a riot or whatever would be deemed not to fit under the first amendment,which I do believe is a very broad parameter. Along with that also goes taking the responsibility and accountability that goes along with spouting off whatever comes out of your pie hole.
It's shit like banning bossy and other words that continues to come out of left to turn women into victims so they can wallow in self pity and tout they are a survivor of something. It gives the left something to champion because of the war on women that they created and continue to wage. By going out of their way to find issues that are sexist, racist, class warfare, and a host of other unadulterated bullshit. Continually trying to fracture the entire fabric of our country. If you don't agree with the left and they can't back up their facts. The first thing they resort to is character assassination, name calling, and other hateful things wishing people would die, get raped, or murdered and/or aborted.
Which has confirmed a pretty solid belief and keeping in mind the people who are usually doing most of the complaining about something. Are usually the worst offenders of what they are complaining about. We all know those assholes who bitch about everything thing and their life is more fucked up than most others. If you don't know anyone like that, you're the miserable fuck I' talking about.
Which in turn gives them a false sense of doing something of importance and fighting for whatever douchbaggery hair brain scheme some liberal nut finds offensive and oppresses whatever group of people it is. Pick one! Gays, blacks, women, transgender, whom ever. Letting themselves to believe they are some sort of martyr for the good of all.
There are a great number of social programs and entitlements that have hurt more than they have helped or, haven,t worked at all. This is very racist, sexist, or homophobic depending on what subject you are discussing. Just like the Jim Crowe laws, gun control, forming the KKK. All that shit was brought on by democrats. I remember seeing what they used to call push cards. Many of them had a whit man on one side saying the Democratic party was for the white man. The other half of the card had a stereotypical caricature of a black man saying the Republican party was for blacks.
Even the democratically controlled KKK distributed push cards with all of the republicans names and photos so they could be harassed or killed, white or black.
These programs and entitlements were designed to keep people stuck in poverty because the left believe certain types of people are too ignorant and/or are inferior. And these people need told how to live. Just visit any inner city where these programs and entitlements are supposed to be helping people. South side of Chicago, LA, East Cleveland, New York city. Shitty schools, gang violence, living in deplorable conditions. It's ridiculous people have to live that way in the United States in this day and age.
If being called bossy is derogatory you should own it if your personality or goals in life are to hold a leadership position. If your self esteem is that low, or that sensitive you better suck it up buttercup, because the world is a tough place to be in.
Somewhere along the line somebody failed you by not teaching you the necessary survival skills to cope with being called bossy. If it offends you, you're probably not in a position to be called bossy. Because you probably don't have the grit to be a leader any how.
That's a drop in the bucket compared to a lot of the rhetoric, vitriol, and hatred one will have to put up with during a lifetime. And the people that spew this shit tend to have miserable lives and are miserable and seem to feed on making everyone else miserable.
Would you rather have young girls called cunts, bitches, whores, sluts, cum dumpsters, or a lengthy list of other derogatory remarks. If you can't handle being called bossy, how the fuck are you going to handle being called anything else? Or, put up with a lot of other bullshit life throws in your direction? If anything ban these words. Even thought I don't believe in banning any words. If words or subjects make people uncomfortable they need to be discussed and dealt with accordingly. It interferes with free speech whether or not it's racist, sexist, homophobic, or considered taboo depending on your beliefs. Wouldn't it be better to discuss these issues and educate people how truly ignorant this stuff is? I don't really give a shit what people say. Unless it insights a riot or whatever would be deemed not to fit under the first amendment,which I do believe is a very broad parameter. Along with that also goes taking the responsibility and accountability that goes along with spouting off whatever comes out of your pie hole.
It's shit like banning bossy and other words that continues to come out of left to turn women into victims so they can wallow in self pity and tout they are a survivor of something. It gives the left something to champion because of the war on women that they created and continue to wage. By going out of their way to find issues that are sexist, racist, class warfare, and a host of other unadulterated bullshit. Continually trying to fracture the entire fabric of our country. If you don't agree with the left and they can't back up their facts. The first thing they resort to is character assassination, name calling, and other hateful things wishing people would die, get raped, or murdered and/or aborted.
Which has confirmed a pretty solid belief and keeping in mind the people who are usually doing most of the complaining about something. Are usually the worst offenders of what they are complaining about. We all know those assholes who bitch about everything thing and their life is more fucked up than most others. If you don't know anyone like that, you're the miserable fuck I' talking about.
Which in turn gives them a false sense of doing something of importance and fighting for whatever douchbaggery hair brain scheme some liberal nut finds offensive and oppresses whatever group of people it is. Pick one! Gays, blacks, women, transgender, whom ever. Letting themselves to believe they are some sort of martyr for the good of all.
There are a great number of social programs and entitlements that have hurt more than they have helped or, haven,t worked at all. This is very racist, sexist, or homophobic depending on what subject you are discussing. Just like the Jim Crowe laws, gun control, forming the KKK. All that shit was brought on by democrats. I remember seeing what they used to call push cards. Many of them had a whit man on one side saying the Democratic party was for the white man. The other half of the card had a stereotypical caricature of a black man saying the Republican party was for blacks.
Even the democratically controlled KKK distributed push cards with all of the republicans names and photos so they could be harassed or killed, white or black.
These programs and entitlements were designed to keep people stuck in poverty because the left believe certain types of people are too ignorant and/or are inferior. And these people need told how to live. Just visit any inner city where these programs and entitlements are supposed to be helping people. South side of Chicago, LA, East Cleveland, New York city. Shitty schools, gang violence, living in deplorable conditions. It's ridiculous people have to live that way in the United States in this day and age.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
